Any thoughts on it and/or tactics employed with it?
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: 3 at the back.. Tue 20 Nov - 10:55
As discussed the other night iv thought about it,
slightly put off by stus epic failure with it when Paul ran about 100 games with his Roma side playing against jas Ancona who served him with a 99.9% win percentage
Would maybe try it against sides without width but wouldn't be brave enough to try it in a league game without some extensive trials
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: 3 at the back.. Tue 20 Nov - 16:05
Stu was playing it with SLO wasn't he? I think used with FAS it could be ok. GK, CL, CB, CR, AM, BW, DL, DR, TM, ST, S2.
Rob@Barcelona World Star - 99/99
Posts : 3377 Reputation : 1315 Join date : 2009-11-29 Age : 52 Location : London
Subject: Re: 3 at the back.. Tue 20 Nov - 16:09
I believe Paul has fixed some of the issues with 3 CB's.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: 3 at the back.. Tue 20 Nov - 16:09
surely you cant play it without WK's?
you'd get murdered!, wasnt' it Mark that tried to play a second half without full backs?