| Game Development idea | |
|
+3Phil@Watford Tom Paul Hemmings 7 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 14:29 | |
| just been looking at this.
just thinking about what u were sugesting about making the playing field bigger,what about distinguishing a little more between players heights, now that we are all a little more familiar with how the system works and the importance of players being able to see their Centre forwards.
So when a winger/winghalve looks for his CF there is more of a distinction between what is a Tall player and a very tall player or what constitutes what is more of a physical presence in the box
at the minute there is 6ft to 6.4 = tall & 6.4ft above = xtall.
at derby for instance we have paul green who is 6ft yet shaun barker is 6ft 3 - in the game there would be no difference in there phsical attributes yet in real life they are leagues apart.
granted this isnt the best example to the masses but i hope u catch my drift, the gap between a 6ft player and a 6ft4 player is quite significant in my book and im sure we can all name examples from our own clubs where to put to certain players in the same category isnt quite right, just a thought but
how about :
6ft - under 6.2ft = tall
6.2 to under 6.4 very tall
6.4 and above = extra tall. |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 14:31 | |
| norwich 0 watford 1 63% 8 crosses adebayor goal 3subs 3sups 2goods
norwich 1 watford 1 64% 6 crosses mcgeady goal 322
norwich 0 watford 0 70% 5 crosses 34 gyan poor
norwich 0 watford 0 67% 10crosses 421good 3chances3saves
seems crosses arent turning into chances as much as i'd expect. |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 14:32 | |
| so Will's idea of increasing the number of heights could work to help remedy this, I will try that later once ive finished testing the new field... |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 14:33 | |
| Maybe jaimies wingers are just crap try it with a team with some proper wingers |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 14:38 | |
| norwich 0 watford 0 77% 16 crosses 421poor agger cfgood still only 5 chances still not right. |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 14:44 | |
| norwich 2 watford 2 62% 7 crosses 5 chances 3 saved 1sub5sups2good1poor agger again. thats seems a bit better certainly more exciting.
I have to use the same teams else all the stats change and I have to start again, but will try other combos as well. |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 14:55 | |
| norwich 0 watford 2 71% 6 crosses 7 chances 4 saves adebayor enrigue goals 3sups2subs1good thats much better I think its cracked for SLO standard.
norwich 0 watford 1 67% 6crosses 5chances 4saves gyan
norwich 1 watford 1 70% 3crosses 9chances 6saves
norwich 1 watford 3 66% 7crosses 5chances 2saves
this seems about right not taking into account individual situations in games like offsides,sendingoffs etc
so i'll try with rob's inter milan as they also play with SLO standard |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 14:57 | |
| ac 0 inter 1 55% 1cross 3chances 2saves higuain 0subs6sups2goods p2subbed |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:33 | |
| ac 0 inter 0 59% 1cross 2chances 2saves 1sub4sup3good lavezzimom
ac 0 inter 1 56% 0crosses 2chances 1saves ribery goal
ac 0 inter 0 63% 0crosses 0chances 2sub3sup2good
seems like 2 good sides cancelling each out atm |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:40 | |
| ac 1 inter 1 61% 1cross 1chance 0saves higuain
lets try something different
inter 3 ac 1 52% 0cross 5chances cavani dimaria pirlo |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:45 | |
| strange Inter dont seem to be able to score most of their games are ending up without them scoring more than 1 |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:46 | |
| lets try this
inter 4 hull 0 63% 5cross 11chances 7saved
still not brilliant |
|
| |
Rob@Barcelona World Star - 99/99
Posts : 3379 Reputation : 1318 Join date : 2009-11-29 Age : 52 Location : London
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:46 | |
| |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:50 | |
| took try of winghalves
inter 5 hull 0 75% 9cross 9chances 4saved
yes thats much better, sometimes putting try on winghalves doesnt work, they can try too hard cos they already track back and get forward so sometimes get tired quicker. try is almost implied for winghalves.
high agg of 7 isnt helping them either |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:53 | |
| ac 0 inter 1
ac 1 inter 1
ac 0 inter 1
ac 0 inter 0
thats now working the way i would expect having taken out the trys and reduced the aggr so i9'll move on to the SLO wingbacks now with Roma. |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:57 | |
| ancona 3 roma 0 piatti2 i thought he might score a few 51% 0cross 0chances
hang on i just realised roma dont play the SLO wingbacks they play with an extra Dy instead of ST. so im just going to change that excess Dy for a ST just for the testing. |
|
| |
Phil@Watford World Star - 99/99
Posts : 2101 Reputation : 1081 Join date : 2009-11-28 Age : 34 Location : Kendal
Order Sheet CLUB:
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 15:58 | |
| just got too say this is hugely enlightening for people wanting to swap formations/currently using the formation and a huge credit for you for putting so much time into the game!
i'm looking through my turn as ur posting changing things.
i forgot the Special Action for Wages, do you mind reminding me? lol. |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:03 | |
| ancona 1 roma 1 56% 4cross 4chances 3saves maxwell 1sub2sup1good
ancona 2 roma 2 46% 2cross 3chances 1saves pazzini2 1sub1sup4good
ancona played standard MIX 442 so they do outnumber roma on the wide areas.
ancona 1 roma 0 50% 2cross 1chance
seems to be working as id expect |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:04 | |
| - Phil@Arsenal wrote:
- just got too say this is hugely enlightening for people wanting to swap formations/currently using the formation and a huge credit for you for putting so much time into the game!
i'm looking through my turn as ur posting changing things.
i forgot the Special Action for Wages, do you mind reminding me? lol. wages ? usually dealings give for players or rehire for staff |
|
| |
Ben@Plymouth World Star - 99/99
Posts : 3338 Reputation : 1565 Join date : 2010-09-22 Age : 39
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:04 | |
| This is an awesome insight Paul - seems as thought people are getting better ratings as well which is always good! |
|
| |
Phil@Watford World Star - 99/99
Posts : 2101 Reputation : 1081 Join date : 2009-11-28 Age : 34 Location : Kendal
Order Sheet CLUB:
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:05 | |
| - Paul Hemmings wrote:
- Phil@Arsenal wrote:
- just got too say this is hugely enlightening for people wanting to swap formations/currently using the formation and a huge credit for you for putting so much time into the game!
i'm looking through my turn as ur posting changing things.
i forgot the Special Action for Wages, do you mind reminding me? lol. wages ? usually dealings give for players or rehire for staff Too set a Wage Group, Sorry. |
|
| |
Tom@Charlton World Star - 99/99
Posts : 5214 Reputation : 2231 Join date : 2009-11-29 Location : Nottingham
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:07 | |
| Don't think you can do that anymore Phil |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:07 | |
| if i change roma back to how stuart had them setup we get
ancona 4 roma 1 52% 4cross 2chances pazzini
so the expanded field of play seems to be working for the standard SLO and SLO wingbacks tactic in this early test.
Last edited by Paul Hemmings on Fri 24 Feb - 16:10; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
Tom@Charlton World Star - 99/99
Posts : 5214 Reputation : 2231 Join date : 2009-11-29 Location : Nottingham
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:08 | |
| |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:08 | |
| - Phil@Arsenal wrote:
- Paul Hemmings wrote:
- Phil@Arsenal wrote:
- just got too say this is hugely enlightening for people wanting to swap formations/currently using the formation and a huge credit for you for putting so much time into the game!
i'm looking through my turn as ur posting changing things.
i forgot the Special Action for Wages, do you mind reminding me? lol. wages ? usually dealings give for players or rehire for staff Too set a Wage Group, Sorry. cant do that anymore each player is treated as a separate command now, cos of all the different possible outcomes. |
|
| |
Paul Hemmings Games Master
Posts : 39623 Reputation : 3201 Join date : 2009-12-02 Location : Cornwall
| Subject: Re: Game Development idea Fri 24 Feb - 16:13 | |
| charlton 3 boro 1 72% 3cross 4chances lucas sturridge wilshere 1sub4sup3good3aver how do the perfs compare Tom with what you got this week ? |
|
| |
| Game Development idea | |
|